The Pope's cunning plan to bring conservative Anglicans back into the Roman fold has prompted a deluge of tricky questions, and sent a sure message to Catholics that they can forget any little gifts of modernity under this year's Christmas tree
I have to say when the poaching Pope let everyone in on his secret to woo Anglicans who can’t face the realities that women and gays are actually human beings with rights, there was quite a reaction in North America and of course, Britain, home of the great schism that led to the creation of Anglicanism in the first place. In very Catholic Canada (14 million Catholics compared to 610,000 Anglicans) it comes just as a Catholic Bishop has been charged with possessing screeds of child pornography….a Bishop who was the go-to person for men in his parish who had been sexually abused by priests over many years, years ago. What more can you say.
Well, perhaps a little more thought could have gone in to that ongoing scourge, but the man once dubbed ‘God’s rottweiler’ was otherwise occupied concocting something to dangle in front of Anglicans who can’t deal with women, or heaven forbid (as apparently it does), gay priests? Come on over to the Vatican, and don’t worry about all the annoying little details that we here in our own little country insist our team goes through to establish their Catholic cred.
This is of course particularly pertinent when it comes to the issue of married priests. Seems it is now officially irrelevant if you started off as an Anglican priest, got married and did all that other stuff your Catholic counterparts have not been allowed to do publicly, but have sure been up to in private. Note alimony payments made to children of priests even – or especially – in ultra-Catholic Ireland. And while on that subject, what about all those priests who fell in love and had to leave the church – sometimes with nun in tow. Do they get to come back into the fold so to speak, if of course they would so deign?
In the meantime for the Anglicans who can’t abide the idea of a chick in a long frock like theirs having the same rights for promotion as they do, there now exists the lure of coming home to Papa. Il Papa. All will be forgiven from Henry on down in the name of collective conservatism…and don’t forget to bring the wife and kids. Will they be in the post ordination family photo? Well they may help to fill the increasingly empty Sunday pews with faces on the smooth side of 60.
Of course the fleeing Anglicans will have to do a little retraining, be re-ordained and such like, but apparently the Pope is betting the sanctuary from the cruel world in which women are more than the lowly servants of priests – i.e. nuns – will more than offset a bit of liturgical swat.
It is not as if the Catholic’s own flock isn’t being raided in certain parts of the world – look at the inroads the Pentecostals claim to have made in
How would a new ‘Angothlic’ priest deal with that one?
And what, prey tell, would be the answer if an Anglican female priest wanted to change teams?
So what’s the Pope really up to?
Well he’s doing a heck of a job if his ultimate aim is to make the Anglican Church more attractive to people who consider women and gays have just as much right to be in positions of church hierarchy – should they want to. These people will supposedly be quite happy to see their ultra-conservative co-worshipers, common prayer book in hand, wander off to
Or perhaps Benedict is actually trying to out-Islam Islam. At 1.2 billion and growing fast the Muslim congregation has already surpassed that of the combined Christian churches, and in many parts of the world it’s mighty ‘traditionalist’ when it comes to these problematic hybrids of Adam.
Wallace Simpson must be spinning in her pearl- and tweed-lined grave, but not half as fast as ‘enry.