While the outcome of the election hangs in limbo for a few more days, one thing is sure – Labour is fighting desperately against a mood for a change which has been entrenched for many months

If we look back almost a year to the day, a basic rolling average of the six most recent polls at 30 October 2007 gives a result which bears striking similarity to current rolling polls.

30 October 07

Pollwatch at 27 October 2008







NZ First









United F






What it illustrates is just how difficult the last year has been for Labour. Helen Clark has been doggedly battling to remain in the hunt despite the problems of longevity, particularly the electorate’s ennui with Labour’s approach to moral issues.

The fact that Labour remains a gambler’s chance is remarkable given the nose-diving economy. That chance will be determined by the nuances of MMP and Helen Clark’s skill at fashioning alliances. Labour remaining in the hunt is also a reflection of lingering uncertainty over National’s true agenda (though we have yet to see the impact – if any – of Labour’s H-bomb stumbles at the end of last week).

Clark’s chances are not helped by NZ First’s likely demise. While no sane person can write Peters off until after the inevitable High Court recount, it now seems NZ First’s only chance might be a freak victory by Ron Mark in Rimutaka.

Setting aside the mood for face changes, there is little mood for any substantial change to the policy settings Clark and Cullen have set in place over the last nine years. Perhaps the most striking aspect of this election has been the way Labour’s social democracy now dominates the policy debate. On every issue of substance save tax, neo-liberalism has surrendered to the new social democratic consensus.

As a country we now believe again in investing in public services. We believe once again in owning key assets like airlines and railways. We want cheap primary health care. We expect low cost tertiary education. We want ACC to remain as it is. We celebrate the Cullen Fund and KiwiSaver. We want our government to give nurses and teachers and soldiers and police officers decent pay rises.

This is the stuff that gives Roger Douglas palpitations. But they are now fixtures of our political firmament. Clark and Cullen have emerged victorious over Douglas and Prebble. After the new right upheavals of the 1980s and 90s, New Zealand is now comfortable as a more redistributive, activist and socially democratic economy and society.

So why is middle New Zealand willing to put this at risk? Well, Saturday will tell us if they are.

If Labour manages to lift its support by a couple of percent and then forge a coalition, we know how they will govern. It will be incremental and risk averse, continuing to usher in social democratic prescriptions to fix the ills of the free market. We will see the government continue to drag the business community towards a more sustainable basis.

National’s approach is more a mystery. They say they won’t sell any state assets, tamper with health spending, undo employment law, reverse the nuclear-free policy, or re-introduce market rents for state houses. So what exactly would they do? Tinkering with the RMA won’t grab too many headlines.

Doing nothing but managing under the current policy settings is the approach that Keith Holyoake’s National took in the 1960s. What was okay then – a managerial approach to governing – won’t wash in the 24-7 media environment of modern politics. It is a recipe for inertia. And inertia in politics is deadly.

What is clear, however, is that regardless who wins the battle on Saturday, Clark won the war.

Comments (5)

by Craig Ranapia on November 04, 2008
Craig Ranapia

What was okay then – a managerial approach to governing – won’t wash in the 24-7 media environment of modern politics.

I'm sorry to be quite this blunt, David, but perhaps the ADHD-afflicted stunt monkeys of the "media environment" need to build a bridge and get the f**k over themselves, because the world does not exist to keep you people distracted and entertained.

If anything is rather clear to me, it's that Labour has been desperately trying to convince people that a change of Government would lead to seismic radical change.  And unless something truly cataclysmic happens in the next three days, it's pretty clear that it was a risky strategy that failed.

There's a real, if rather subtle, difference between "intertia" and careful prudent change that isn't beholden to rigid ideology.  But that's too hard for the Press Gallery to get its head around. I can get a ball of wool for you all to play with.

by Graeme Edgeler on November 04, 2008
Graeme Edgeler

Recounts occur in district courts. The High Court hears election petitions :-)

by David Lewis on November 04, 2008
David Lewis

Craig, bluntness is ok.  Personally, I agree.  I've had to battle with press gallery I hanker for a quieter, less frenetic times, when governments can just quietly govern.  We used to see Prime Ministers go overseas for months at a time.  Now if they're away for more than a week, it's seen as a junket.  The media-political environment has changed.  If National win and don't set an agenda, then it's going to be difficult for them.  Likewise for Labour.  Last night I pitied both Clark and Key for Jenni McManus' criticisms about them lacking a plan for the economic crisis.  It seems she thinks a NZ politician can almost instantly deliver a magic plan to sort out the economy. The media just love attacking the 'vision-less' politician.  And, like it or not, that's why the semblence of an agenda is rather important.

by Ian MacKay on November 04, 2008
Ian MacKay

From the National point of view, an Economic crisis is a good thing in that it provides them the excuse for doing "brave" necessary things that they had previously promised to not do, while in Election mode.

by on May 16, 2012

In the modern, the Coach Outlet are famous for its high quality and unique design. As the Coach Factory offer bag are made of soft, supple leather, developed in Italy, Coach Outlet Online including several pockets which can contain different kinds of things, every young girl love Coach Outlet Online. In the same time. Coach Wallets brand is a limitless bags inspiration for the future. Coach Factory Outlet offer Coach Shoulder Bagsgive fame and reputation to coach brand incessantly. Coach Outlet is also a process of accomplishment of classic. There should be nothing that can stop your love for Coach Purses Outlet! If you are for any occasion dressing, wearing a beautiful dress is not enough. Cheap Coach Handbags is known as one of America's leading designer labels in the market. Coach Factory has been a corporation well-known for the style and elegance of each and every item they have designed Coach Outlet Online and produced throughout the years. Like a baseball glove, Coach Shoulder Bags mould to their owners as they age, making them incredibly comfortable to wear. Coach Shoulder Bags offered by the Coach Factory Outlet furthermore look vaguely sailor-y to folks, while that is most likely just the blend of some diverse shade, from http://www.saleincoachoutlet.net/ they generally glance easy together with fantastic, as well as accents and trim are simply sufficient coloration to provide it a sping time sense.

Post new comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.