The US has begun the long process of overturning law that required gay soldiers to lie about their sexual orientation. But overturning the 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' policy promises to be a nasty, dirty fight
‘Don’t ask, don’t tell’ has been a policy devised by US politicians who have not had the guts to do what is right because of the potential electoral consequences. At long last it has been outed as such.
It may have been a motto that its founding Commander-in-Chief Bill Clinton preferred to live his own life by, but it has been an insult to soldiers brave enough to step up and put their lives on the line for their country.
Good enough to die, only if they lie.
In an extraordinary move this week the
And so begins the process that will fulfill another of Obama’s election promises, but make no mistake, as Obama himself seems to always say, this will not be easy. Oh really. Just a few minutes searching online and reading letters to editors and reactions from certain politicians reveal an ugly, boorish, ignorant and prejudiced underbelly of homophobes and gay bashers who fully intend to be very, very loud on this issue.
The military is no more immune from homophobes than it is from homosexuals, and testimony from gay soldiers who have been fired once outed, or fled to
The ultimate decision will be that of the Congress, and will be some time off. In the meantime however, Admiral Mike Mullen and Defence Secretary Robert Gates say they are going to start making moves to allow openly gay people to serve in the military. This is likely to include a moratorium on discharges until a full review of the 16-year-old law has been completed.
Essentially that means pre-empting a law change which may not eventuate. In so doing the military’s announcement of working towards a new policy opens huge legal issues for those who may be outed from now on. How can the military comply with its current law and discharge a soldier when that soldier now has such strong evidence that his or her top commanders don’t agree with the policy anymore, that they are going to “do the right thing” and are already working to change it?
It possibly has even more implications for the estimated 13,000 men and women who have already been discharged because they have been outed.
Or what about soldiers like Private Bethany Smith who deserted and fled to
Of course this points to two major issues.
It shows the ‘Don’t ask, don’t tell’ policy was not being strictly enforced when it didn’t suit and it gives a glimpse into the sort of education issues that confront the military when they do change the law.
It also makes a huge joke of the rather specious and blatantly convenient claims justifying the wars in
In the testimony Admiral Mullen made to the Committee when explaining the proposed law changes he admonished the military for devaluing able and committed soldiers by forcing them to lie about who they really are.
It is finally being openly stated that these soldiers live not only with the daily threat of being taken out by the enemy, but of losing their careers if they failed to be dishonest with their own bosses. Honesty, it seems, has been too tricky for the Armed Forces. Pretending is good, especially if recruitment is down.
And then there’s Senator John McCain. War hero. The former Presidential Candidate once said he was happy with the ‘Don’t ask, don’t tell’ business unless the top brass came to him and said it was time to change. Well that’s what they have now done, but of course it is not particularly convenient timing for McCain. He’s busy trying to be a Republican leader and would prefer, it seems from his tirade against Gates and Mullen, to find next tier top brass who object to any change in line with conservative ‘values’.
Such values amount to tolerating people pretending to be something they are not, so long as they can make up the numbers in the killing fields.
Polished boots and gleaming buttons have blinded the Armed Forces from the immorality of the demands they have put on fellow human beings.
Like some embarrassing old relative they kept hidden from the neighbours, too many of the military and political hierarchies considered being upfront about the bravery of gay soldiers all too embarrassing. It is like those people who insist some of their best friends are gay or black, but they just can’t seem to remember the names of such friends. There has always been knowledge of gay soldiers otherwise why would such a ridiculous law have been implemented in the first place?
Perhaps all the effort to oppose ending the current law could instead be spent on some forces-wide courses in basic human rights, help in avoiding post traumatic suicides, tactics to prevent spousal abuse and homicides, anger management, alcohol and drug abuse, and possibly a myriad of other real social problems that exist within the US military.