The United States' veto of a draft resolution condemning Israel's continued illegal settlement construction has exposed the Obama administration of kowtowing to Israeli pressure and thereby paying lip service to human rights in the Middle East. Bad timing big boy.
It would appear the Obama White House has learned little from the fight for human and democratic rights roiling the
Slow to the party to be on the right side of history, Obama & Co. gradually played catch-up and supported the peaceful and reasonable calls from people denied the sorts of liberties we take for granted every single day.
And then came the question of the rights of the Palestinians.
Highly inconvenient for the
While fourteen of the fifteen member United Nations Security Council voted in favour of a draft resolution condemning as illegal all Israeli building of settlements in occupied Palestinian lands and calling for all settlement building to stop immediately, America alone spurned the Palestinians.
The Americans had warned – or threatened if you believe the rhetoric of the Palestinian Authority – that the PA should not call on the UNSC for such support because the only way to sort out the issue is through negotiated talks.
Appealing to the UNSC was considered “unhelpful” from an American point of view.
I am sure the demonstrators in Tahrir were considered by Mubarak to be unhelpful…as are those now protesting other oppressive kings and presidents in the region.
Actually even the Americans were supposed to have found the continued settlement building “unhelpful” to the peace process. The Palestinians sure did for the simple reason that Israelis were building on land that would be part of a future Palestinians state, thereby establishing “facts on the ground” which mean if peace was ever arrived at it would be impossible to return that land to Palestinians.
What is the Obama administration playing at?
Desperate to repair its image on the so-called Arab street it dropped its immoral – or perhaps more kindly amoral – stance when it came to domestic/foreign affairs concerns for stability trumping the rights of citizens of those strategic nations.
But all this seems to grind to an abrupt halt when it comes to the rights of Palestinians who are imprisoned, shot, tear gassed, evicted, harassed and disenfranchised every day by the occupying Israeli forces.
What the hell is the difference between rights for Palestinians and those of Egyptians, Libyans, Bahrainis, Algerians, Yemenis or Tunisians?
Well the difference is of course the power of the Jewish lobby in the
There are many Israelis and Jewish Americans who condemn this manipulation, but not enough – yet.
And so after making a really strong and undeniably committed start to dealing with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict early in his term, Obama has effectively deferred to continuing the policy status quo of his predecessor George W. Bush.
Sure he has resisted Israeli pressure to launch an all out attack on
Now when faced with a choice of supporting the illegal actions of
An old fashioned term would be lily-livered.
The draft resolution of the PA was even written using the exact same language as the
Once again
At least
It must have been a blow for her that the first time she had to pull out the all-powerful veto card was to dismiss the human rights of Palestinians.
In so doing the
It makes a mockery of its role in
It was not even a year ago that Obama announced to the United Nations that by September 2011, it could be welcoming the new sovereign, independent, contiguous state of Palestine and he was awarded with applause and standing ovations.
How cheap these words must all be for Palestinians thrown out of their homes to make way for Jewish-only condos. How cheap the
The world thought Obama would have had the balls to deal with this situation, but alas he has proven the opposite.
It is the PA that has shown itself as tough and focused by refusing to cave in to