It's his way or the highway for Winston Peters, after a speech today ruling New Zealand First out of government. Either the disgruntled rally to his flag or he's history

That may be the sound of the door slamming on Labour's vain election hopes. Winston Peters has just announced that he won't enter a government with anyone after this election. Not National or Labour. Or the cat's mother, for that matter. To quote his speech:

New Zealand First is not going with National.

New Zealand First is not going with Labour either. We are making that clear here today.

New Zealand First is not going with the Greens or the Maori Party.

There is too much at stake.

That's Winston who has it in bold (and underlined). And given the race relations rhetoric in the rest of the speech, I guess you can take no deal with Mana as a given!

You might be tempted to point out that on current polling he's not going to make it into parliament and no-one's actually inviting him to do anything. But still, Peters is being firm with all those potential suitors. His message: No deal, no how.

If only he had a 'NO' sign he could hold up to show how he feels...

But seriously... Phil Goff refused to do Epsom-type deals with New Zealand First to help them get a parliamentary seat, but has been at pains to keep his options open, saying that he worked with Peters in the previous government and could do so again.

Indeed, the only way the maths could really work for Labour as a government was if it could form a Labour-Greens-New Zealand First coalition after the election.

Of course there were a heck of a lot of ifs and maybes involved in that -- the Greens and NZF holding together was always "highly unlikely" (indeed Labour and New Zealand First would have had some pretty big policy obstacles to overcome) and at least one of those parties was going to have to get a major campaign bump.

But you never knew. And if the numbers got close, maybe some deals could be made.

John Key, for his part, had ruled out Peters for the second election in a row, saying:

"If Winston Peters holds the balance of power it will be a Phil Goff-led Labour government."

But now we know for certain. Peters has thrown Goff's courtesy back in his face.

In the next three week it's all on Labour to make up the ground on National, and that would take something remarkable and unforseen. The Greens' growth has mostly been at the expense of Labour, so it's essentially Labour that has to somehow get within ten points of National by taking votes off National. Even If New Zealand First wastes some votes by getting 3-4% or gets 5% and stays on the cross-benches, that remains true.

Peters' strategy? To give the fingers to all of them.

It makes sense, I guess. He must have been thinking about how we can stand out, how he can find another 2-3 percent, how he can get media attention. This is his solution, his last roll of the dice.

He's always been dependent on the disgruntled vote; now he's just unashamedly pitching for them, saying, "if you think 'bugger the lot of them' then vote for me cos I'm thinking the same thing".

One aside. In his speech he attacks Labour, saying:

"And it’s all very well for Labour to bleat now about the sale of state assets. Labour sold billions of dollars worth of taxpayer assets."

To which I can only respond -- Auckland airport shares. Who sold them? Treasurer Winston Peters. Pot. Kettle. Black.

So when it all boils down, New Zealand First is officially a party seeking a place in Opposition; party leaders have decided it's only hope of winning is to tell people it doesn't want to win. Or in other words, to get into parliament it's making clear it doesn't want to govern. That's another topsy-turvy stance in an already bizarre election where you have a Green MP wanting to lose in Ohariu and a National MP telling people not to vote for him in Epsom. 

At least it stops National party supporters running the line that a vote for Winston Peters is a vote for Phil Goff.

The question now is who this helps; whether this gives New Zealand First an electoral boost and some media oxygen, or whether it allows voters to dismiss them out of hand.

After three decades in national politics, this is do or die for Peters. The polls at the end of this week will settle it one way or the other.

Comments (9)

by alexb on November 06, 2011
alexb

Ah well, the delusions of a possible Labour government were nice while they lasted. The question for those on the left must be now who will be best placed to put the brakes on National. I can't see UF or the Maori Party being any more than yes men, given the way this term has gone. Conservative and ACT will pull National right socially and economically respectively. The Greens will likely be torn apart by a coalition with National. Peters may or may not have meant to, but this action really shafts those on the left who are looking for some joy out of this election.

by tussock on November 06, 2011
tussock

@alexb, election's not 'till the 26th, mate. Remember when that dodgy worm got 10% of the electorate to switch to United First? Anything can happen in this game.

by Andrew Geddis on November 06, 2011
Andrew Geddis

Is an abstention on issues of confidence and supply "going with" anyone? Because say NZF got 7 MPs ... if they don't vote on such issues, then the majority needed to govern becomes 57 MPs (rather than 61). Which means NZF still could decide the Government without having to "support" anyone.

Or should we just take Winston at his word (snigger)?

by Tim Watkin on November 07, 2011
Tim Watkin

That's what I was getting at re wasted votes... but I can't see how NZF could refuse to give supply and confidence to anyone and then have a say in which party formed the government.

And what I didn't take time to mention in the post, Andrew, was that Peters in his speech also said he'd expect the party with the most votes to get first shot at forming a government. I know there's no constitutional reason why that should be so, but again it seems to take him out of the equation.

by Richard Aston on November 07, 2011
Richard Aston

Does it matter ? Without an electoral seat I can't see them getting any seats in parliment. They are bearly scraping the 2.5% mark at the moment. Sounds like Winny is getting desparate hoping to pick up the " keep them honest" vote that Act used to go for .

 

by BeShakey on November 07, 2011
BeShakey

Does anyone really believe that if Winston's seats became critical to forming a government he would keep this promise and send the country to another election?  I suspect he would instead reluctanly accept a ministerial salary and tell us he had no choice.

by Iain Butler on November 07, 2011
Iain Butler

BeShakey: spot on. Remember this is the guy who - having snered at the "baubles of office" coudn't be pursuaded to aprt with his ministerial car until well after the last election. Have baubles; will travel.

by BeShakey on November 07, 2011
BeShakey

Inciteful.  If only more NZers ugg classic argyle knit uk asked themself this campaign.  Of course John Key has already declared an ambition to accelerate his metabolism to catch up with Australias in abounding ways.  Sadly, until Phil Goff can get the numbers to add up there will be many more metabolic allegations, and baking admonitions.

by Tim Watkin on November 07, 2011
Tim Watkin

Cute, Shakey. You've noticed that the spammers have a new tactic, mingling the links in with words cut and paste from the comments. Evil blighters.

And yes, I imagine he could find an excuse should the opportunity to present itself. But he's got to win over tens of thousands more NZers before that.

But it also takes two to tango. Key's quote couldn't be less ambiguous, so if Peters' numbers become crucial it will be a Phil Goff-led government.

Post new comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.