Before we write-off this weekend's G20 meeting as a talkfest, let's appreciate the fact that countries outside Europe and North America are finally getting a seat at the table

Pondering the G20 summit that starts in Washington DC tomorrow is enough to make your head hurt, but what we can safely presume is that this is just the first of many, many meetings to re-design the world's financial systems. We will be hearing about "new global financial architecture" for months, maybe years, to come.

If you're wondering what all the fuss is about, the G20 is an organisation set up in 1999 as a response to the Asian financial crisis and a growing recognition "that key emerging-market countries were not adequately included in the core of global economic discussion and governance". The 20 in G20 is made up of 19 countries – Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, South Korea, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States – and the European Union. Together, they represent about 90 percent of global GNP. Spain, reasonably enough, has wangled a seat at this meeting, but it's fair to say there are plenty of other counties feeling they deserve a say at forums like this one. Say, UAE, Sweden, or, I don't know, New Zealand, for example.

The talk is that this meeting would be "Bretton Woods II". Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, was where delegates from all 44 Allied nations met in July 1944 to sign off on a post-war world financial order. The World Bank and IMF were created there, as was America's dominance of the global economy. All countries present tied their currencies to the US dollar and the US linked its currency to gold. The Bretton Woods system collapsed in 1971, but for a generation it gave western economics some rules to play by.

For those hoping for some new rules from this weekend's meeting, patience is counselled. The Bretton Woods system took two years to design and was put together by countries confident that they were about to win a world war. This time round confidence and the political capital that goes with it are sadly lacking.

President George Bush, as lame a lame duck president as ever there was, is hosting the meeting. President-elect Barack Obama won't be there. The EU wants to reform the IMF and World Bank, Russia wants new global organisations altogether, and like an obese diabetic defending his love of chocolate, Bush is downplaying the need for any new regulation, insisting that free-markets will "help show the way back to economic growth and prosperity". It's hardly an inspiring start.

Finance ministers and central bank governors of the G20 countries, who just met in Brazil last week, agreed that:

...the current financial crisis is largely a result of excessive
risk taking and faulty risk management practices in financial markets,
inconsistent macroeconomic policies, which gave rise to domestic and
external imbalances, as well as deficiencies in financial regulation and
supervision in some advanced countries.

They didn't agree on much else. Not much else that's concrete anyway. Their communique was full of Miss Universe-like promises to design "measures" to restore growth, "review" the adequacy of the IMF and World Bank, "urgently take forward work"... You get the idea.

Still, cynically dismissing the meeting is too easy, and misses a couple of crucial and positive points. The work has to start somewhere and once Bush is gone, what this weekend should make clear is that there is a global consensus for some sort of financial reform. Amidst the finance-speak a will for global financial regulation seems to be growing, and that's vital. The markets over the past decade or two have been innovative in ways the law-makers could barely comprehend, let alone control. In other words, market traders have been using electricity while governments have been regulating candles and matches. New, international regulations are vital.

What shape they will come in is anyone's guess. It may be simpler and quicker to reform the IMF and World Bank or they may have too much baggage and may need to be killed off. The new regulations may try to enforce common standards across the world or they may simply establish some core principles, leaving it to different countries to apply them as per their domestic circumstances and abilities.

But what seems inevitable now is that emerging countries will finally have a say whatever economic organisations and regulators emerge. And that's the second thing to feel positive about this weekend.

The IMF and World Bank have been toys Europe and America wouldn't let anyone else play with. Surely they – the US especially – now feel enough shame to realise that they've failed in their stewardship role and need help.

The Brooking Institution three weeks ago wrote that, "This crisis and the G20 summit on November 15 provide a historic opportunity for the next president of the United States to chart a new course for global cooperation, overcoming the transatlantic and Western biases of recent years, integrating Asia and other emerging economies into the global leadership forum, thereby creating a more effective and legitimate global steering mechanism."

The next president of course won't be there, but Obama seems likely to be open to sharing some power with other countries. At the very least, it means that he can share some of the blame as well. But not even a "liberal, elite" president like Obama will cede US economic supremacy lightly.

Indeed, while all the of the world leaders on display this weekend are sure to talk about new beginnings – and the confidence that should give the markets should not be dismissed – the truth is that this forum begins a new tug-of-war between national sovereignty and international regulation. Capital and markets aren't constrained by nation states; governments are. How, and how far, the rule-makers follow the traders across borders are perhaps the hardest of all the hard questions that this crisis is forcing us to address. There is no answer, of course. The tug-of-war is endless. But these politicians have to find some global answers with some global regulations enforced by some global policemen or the traders will make monkeys of them again.

Former Canadian prime minister Paul Martin is one of the few men so far to have had his reputation enhanced by this crisis. He resisted pressure to deregulate the Canadian banking system and Canada has been relatively un-crunched by the credit crisis. As he told Foreign Policy, "The only answer is ongoing dialogue between regulators, constantly trying to stay, if not a step ahead, at least up to speed with the market".

That can only be done if we get past this amero-centric world view and allow smaller and emerging nations more sway in whatever system emerges. Consider China – it holds a quarter of the world's hard currency reserves and could be the world's largest economy by 2025. Yet it isn't even part of the G8. Then there's India, Brazil, Chile... Poorer countries, while they don't have complicated financial systems at risk from this crisis, are battling to deal with dropping first-world demand. Relative to a year ago, prices of industrial metals are down by 45
percent, energy prices by 32 percent, and agricultural prices by 24 percent. As immigrant workers in the developed world are laid off, the amount being sent home to the developing world in the form of remittances is falling. This is not a problem for the old boys' network to fix alone.

In his interview with Foreign Policy, Martin continued:

The G-20 leaders should use this meeting to begin the reform of other institutions. The fundamental flaw in the G-8 is that it no longer [includes] the major economies: Brazil, India, and China. Brazil and others are not permanent members; they are only guests by sufferance. This makes no sense. Do what you think is necessary with the Bretton Woods institutions, but for heaven’s sake, stop keeping half the world out of them! My view is that a vibrant G-20 will become the instrument of reform.

So perhaps the most significant thing to come out of this weekend's meeting is that it has been held under the auspices of the G20 rather than the G8. The tent is getting just a bit bigger. That, to steal a line of the times, is change we can believe in. And it promises more significant change to come.

Comments (3)

by Peter Salmon on November 19, 2008
Peter Salmon

I agree that G7 should go and G20 replace it.

Just because Obama is coming in and Bush going, do not think that this means the US will in reality be any more willing to play as part of the team.

Congress will not have a bar of it. The US has always been ambivalent about the UN and failed to pay it's share.They will be just as awkward over sovereignty as always. In addition the Europeans are as bad.

A Democratic Congress and a Democratic President is not a recipe for smooth functioning of the system, as past history has proven, look at Clinton's first term.

We saw a lot of words, we have yet to see anyone do anything in the specific global interest as opposed to national interest.

If Obama extends TARP to carmakers then we will know that good old American protectionism is alive and well

 

 

by on May 18, 2012
Anonymous

people are pursuing for Louis vuitton handbags cool, unique, stylish and innovative. Whether it is discount Louis Vuitton or fashion accessories all means a lot for modern society of today. Same is the case with trendy looking burberry handbags. When these are, the excitement just gets doubled. Most chic looking burberry outlet are in fashion now. These are one of the favorite fashion abercrombie and fitch sale accessories for men and women long time ago. If you have not yet tried Louis Vuitton Outlet, it's time to own one and feel the difference it can make burberry bags to your personality. These are just brilliant and fabulous louis vuitton sale . They are most iconic and can provide burberry bags you with a new feeling and enhance confidence. The quality of louis vuitton online is just superior to what you have dreamt of. Today owning a new and trendy looking louis vuitton bagsare not only meant for the wealthy people. They are most iconic and can provide you with a new feeling and enhance abercrombie and fitch online confidence. The quality of abercrombie sale is just superior to what you have dreamt of. Today owning a new and trendy looking abercrombie outlet sale are not only meant for the wealthy people.

by on May 18, 2012
Anonymous

The newest style of Coach Purses Outlet offer ferragamo bags online. Coach Outlet have cheap Coach Diaper Bags, Coach Hobos Handbags ferragamo handbags, Coach Totes Handbags, Coach Outlet Online for cheap, Coach Poppy Handbags, Coach Outlet Online and Coach wallets. Coach Tote Bags are one of the most popular and versatile handbag styles.are well received by the females, especially the young. Stylish design, colorful painting, practical function attract the public's attention soon. All ferragamo outlet we offer here are stylish trims and innovative designs. Coach Outlet Store Online are mostly welcomed and loved by women and even men. Cheap Coach handbags use the unique and fine leather material which is extraordinary in the world. Take your time to select ferragamo sale our best Coach bags cheap for sale with discount wholesale and free and fast shipping. Online register as a member on this website and enjoy your online shopping. Welcome to enjoy shopping our salvatore ferragamo outlet! Our aim is Best quality top service. Just take action! Don't miss the opportunity to own one of these fasionable Discount Coach Handbags on discounted price. Free shipping and non sale tax! Buy ferragamo shoes now and enjoy the fashion world!

Post new comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.