Winston Peters wins the oxygen of media attention and gets back in the game. But do we really want him back? Or has his time passed?

Is Winston Peters the luckiest main in New Zealand right now?

He should make sure he buys a lotto ticket this weekend, because lady luck has settled on his shoulder.

He officially reached 2.9 percent on the One News-Colmar Brunton poll this week; to make it onto the multi-party leaders' debate, TVNZ had stated weeks ago that parties must either have a seat in parliament or reach at least three percent in either of the two Colmar Brunton polls in the first two weeks of November.

Technically, he failed. In most of political life, close isn't enough. You either win or lose a seat, you either reach five percent or you don't. But Colmar Brunton's headline figure rounded him to three percent and TVNZ wanted to be inclusive.

So Winston Peters - former deputy Prime Minister, former Foreign Minister, former Treasurer - gets the oxygen of media attention and the chance to convince another two percent of voters to back him.

Just a week ago he was in the crowd at the Backbenches Auckland Central special begging host Wallace Chapman to include him on the candidates' panel - even though he isn't an Auckland Central candidate.

He knew he needed TV time or was sunk.

On Q+A in June he was almost pathetically trying to put himself back in the political frame, famously ending the interview this way:

GUYON Thanks very much for your time. Appreciate it.

WINSTON You're welcome. We're still relevant.

Well, whether he was relevant or not then, he is now. Just how relevant, however, is still to be seen. Will his rhetorical gifts and his spending promises be enough?

I've always felt that at least five percent of New Zealand voters would support the thrust of his message. But will they vote for him? And will they vote for him in this election?

Three thoughts on that.

First, as we discussed on Q+A, his spending promises are, well, expensive. They include reducing GST to 12.5% or maybe lower, increasing super payments, creating a $500m asset buy-back fund, government matching graduates dollar-for-dollar in their loan repayments, and a 10% discount on power bills for Gold Card holders.

At a time of global economic crises and as we're faced with the cost of rebuilding Christchurch, will voters really respond positively to such hefty spending promises? Or will no-one notice those?

Second, if he hits five percent what about the list MPs he brings in? There are certainly some fresh faces, but including a former weatherman and the former North Shore mayor famous for weeing on trees and angrily texting John Key. Some investigation of those he'd bring in is probably in order.

And finally, there's all the Peters baggage. His stance on asset sales when he was part of a government that sold Auckland airport shares, his promise not to go with any major party in 2005 prior to him doing a deal with Labour, how he went fishing and made the country wait for a government in 1996, and of course the Owen Glenn donation and resulting financial scandal. How long are peoples' memories?

Can the Peters charisma overcome those obstacles? Are those policies in fact an asset? Are fresh faces what people want?

We'll find out over the next 15 days because, like it or not, he's now a talking point of this campaign. Until the next poll, anyway.

Comments (3)

by Richard Aston on November 11, 2011
Richard Aston

He has always had far too much "oxygen of media attention"

I never understand the fancination the media has with him - my daugther was a TV reporter - she said it was just the drama you always knew he could deliver some - but after she got physically attacked by some of his more rabid supporters she went off him .

I reckon he needs less oxygen - it would be kinder ( to us) to let him quietly die.

 

by Tim Watkin on November 11, 2011
Tim Watkin

A lot of reporters have got sick of the abuse and gone off him. But they do their duty - if the people support him, he deserves a voice. Hardly for us to shut down debate me old china.

And I've just figured out who your daughter is!

by Ian MacKay on November 12, 2011
Ian MacKay

"His stance on asset sales when he was part of a government that sold Auckland airport shares..."

I think that the only time Mr Peters was dropped by a PM was when he refused to sign off the selling/privatisation of Wellington Airport. In spite of Mr Key saying repeatedly that every PM has sacked him. I might be wrong but didn't the shennagins over Party finances replicate what was/is happening with say National's secret Trusts? Be fair.

Post new comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.